Ph.D., Human Physiology, 2000. Chief Scientific Officer, Advanced Restoration Technologies, DBA, HairGenesis
Archive for Pharmaceuticals
Im looking for a position in regulatory affairs in pharmaceuticals in Toronto, and there are not many ads around. Does anybody here work in the industry who could give me some info on where is the best place to find ads?
Are there any meetings in the Clinical Research field coming up in Mass?
Posted by: | CommentsMaybe involving biotechs, pharmaceuticals or clinical research in any way
Pharmaceutical Achievers: The Human Face of Pharmaceutical Research
Posted by: | Comments
Product Description
This biographical collection highlights individuals who made outstanding achievements in the arenas of pharmaceuticals and biotechnology. Pharmaceutical Achievers presents chronologically the major directions of pharmaceutical research and, in their historical context, the breakthroughs in treating various diseases. It concludes with a look at tomorrow’s medicines. This work is particularly useful in the classroom, where its accounts of challenges and triumphs may inspire students to consider careers that support pharmaceutical research and development.
Pharmaceutical Achievers: The Human Face of Pharmaceutical Research
Hair Loss Research, Yesterday, Today & Tomorrow
Posted by: | CommentsThe days of bad toupees and worse looking plug jobs are just about behind us. For more than 99% of human history, hair loss has pretty much been an unavoidable part of life. If you lived long enough, sooner or later, your hair, so dense and vibrant in youth, would thin, perhaps just a little, perhaps to the point of slick baldness. Until quite recently, no one could predict with certainty how extensive the loss would be. Even today, there is more art then science in gauging the rate, degree and extent of alopecia that any given person will experience.
For a certain percentage of people affected by the problem, the issue of baldness was never much of an issue. They recognized it as a normal part of aging, shrugged, sighed, and got on with the business of getting through their day. But for others, hair loss became the defining touchstone in their lives, driving many to desperation and some poor souls even to the point of suicide. Pattern hair loss also inspired a legion of creative individuals to imagine solutions, some quite ingenious, others just plain bad.
For thousands of years, concoctions were brewed, hair pieces fabricated, and incantations uttered, all in an effort to turn back the cruel tide. What always remained elusive was a genuine cure.
But as the saying goes, times they are a’changin. Particularly, within the past twenty years, medical science has begun to catch up with pent-up demand. Before we discuss things further, some perspective.
For the sake of brevity, let us touch on the three primary means to address pattern hair loss today. Cosmetic cover up, medical treatment, and surgical restoration. Cosmetic cover up consists of two main approaches. The first involves bulking up the hair or coloring the scalp so as to camouflage the problem. Alternatively, non-living hair may be applied to the scalp in some fashion, e.g. by the use of hair pieces or wigs.
Medical treatment is defined as the use of pharmaceuticals or, more recently, naturally-derived reagents. These drugs or natural compositions may be ingested orally or applied to the scalp, depending on their design.
Surgical restoration is a means to redistribute viable hair bearing skin tissue from the sides and back of the scalp to the front and top so that a cosmetically improved appearance is achieved. Kind of like using sections of lawn from your back yard to fill in empty spots in your front yard. Each of these treatment choices has their place and each has their limitations. At the present time, no single option works well for everyone.
But in coming years, the choices will undoubtedly get better. Much better, in fact. Today, in teaching universities, private labs and elsewhere, the search is on to develop a legitimate cure for pattern hair loss. With the space remaining, this article shall focus on the two most likely candidate approaches likely to bear fruit, gene therapy and hair cloning.
In the next decade, gene therapy will certainly become one of the game changers of 21st Century medicine. At the molecular heart of most debilitating and lethal disease, genetic mutations do their dirty work. Numerous forms of cancer, diseases of aging, and yes, even common pattern hair loss owe their pathogeneses to genetic mutation. Think of genes as the software running the cellular hardware in our bodies and you begin to grasp the concept of how genetic mutation occurs.
As the cells in our body age they are generally replaced, often multiple times. Copies of copies of copies are churned out, for the most part, each without defect or flaw. But as time passes, genetic errors accumulate. Some of these errors are relatively minor and we never notice their occurrence. Others are more serious. Eventually, the errors are serious enough that clinical disease ensues. Gene therapy is a methodology and a new medical discipline that, organ system by organ system, will, in effect, correct genetic errors and restore the cellular machinery to optimal performance.
In the hair follicle, key genes have already been identified, that when pathologically mutated, result in hair growth dysfunction. There are any number of hair loss diseases and most are mediated in some manner by genetic events. Common pattern hair loss happens to be a disorder where a number of genes effectively conspire to gang up on susceptible scalp hair follicles causing them to whither and die. Correcting these genetic errors, gene by gene, is high on the list of those molecular biologists focused on the problem at hand.
Hair cloning takes a different approach to the challenge in that rather than reprograming defective cellular machinery, brand new hair follicles are grown as complete organ structures from a carefully selected population of stem cells in vitro. These stem cells are extracted from whatever viable donor hair remains and amplified under culture conditions so that they become numerous. The cells are then subjected to growth factors and other stimuli whereby entire hair follicles are created in a three dimensional in vitro setting.
Ultimately, when viable, these newly grown hair follicles will be inserted into the denuded areas of the scalp where, presumably, they will happily and vigorously recapitulate a pattern of healthy hair growth. This amazing feat will require a synthesis of molecular biology, proteomics, 3D tissue scaffolding, and other marvels of 21st Century science. To achieve the goal we will need to develop an exquisitely detailed understanding of tissue organogenesis such that the newly synthesized hair follicle’s structural axis and polarity may be properly aligned. Let’s go through that concept again, but this time using an easy, albeit imperfect, analogy.
Imagine, for a moment that you are a future farmer trying to create a new onion from onion stem cells. At some point in the process you’ll probably want to make sure that the roots are pointing down and the stalk is pointing up, so that your onions don’t end up growing upside down or sideways. Same principles apply here. All the parts and pieces need to fit together correctly so that the machine works as it should. Using this crude analogy we can begin to appreciate some of the challenges of working in three dimensions that do not occur when, for example, growing a simple monolayer of cells in a petri dish.
Monumental challenges notwithstanding, the odds are reasonably good that in the coming decade, one or both of these approaches will constitute the new state-of-the-art in hair restoration methodology.
Pharmaceuticals in Water Supply
Posted by: | CommentsReports of pharmaceuticals in water supply samples were carried by every major new organization earlier this year. Along with spin-offs of that covered how they got there and what the consequences might be to human health. The one thing that none of the articles mentioned was what individuals could do to remove the threat. They talked about how sewage treatment facilities could remove nearly all of the traces by using reverse osmosis. They mentioned it was an expensive step that few facilities choose to use.
They noted that improvements at drinking water treatment facilities could reduce the level of pharmaceuticals in water supply systems. The congressman said they would hold
a hearing concerning the topic.
Everyone showed concern, except some callous representatives from major providers. They simply said the public didn’t need to know, because they wouldn’t understand and might overreact to the news.
But, otherwise, everyone agreed that something should be done. The congressman said they would hold a hearing concerning the threat. The EPA said they knew that it was a “major concern”.
But, no one bothered to explain that people could protect their families, if they chose, too. We have the technology and in the home, it is not that expensive to use. It simply requires a sub-micron particle filter, activated carbon and multi-media blocks.
Some of us have known about pharmaceuticals in water supply systems for years. One of the most common is the hormone estradiol, used in birth control pills. Only some of the hormone is absorbed by the body. The rest is ejected along with other waste products and flushed down the drain.
From there, it goes to a treatment facility. They do the minimum required by law and then dump the waters into a river. Researchers have found numerous fish downstream from these facilities with strange mutations.
Some had both male and female sex organs. Some had small heads. Others were sterile. It was learned that all of these mutations were caused by exposure to estradiol. So, what can the hormones and other pharmaceuticals found in water supply samples do to human beings?
As usual, the greatest risk is to babies that are still developing. Scientists have shown that some of the combinations slow down the growth of human cells. Other combinations, such as the hormones increase the growth of cancerous cells.
It is interesting to note that some of the common contaminants present in tap water cause and accelerate cancer growth. If a person doesn’t have a home water filtration device, not only does he have an increased risk of cancer, but if he has a tumor, it will grow faster. So, now, if a person doesn’t have a home filtration device, not only does he have an increases risk of cancer, but if he has a tumor, it will grow faster.
None of this is necessary. We can remove the chemicals that cause cancer, the chlorine that tastes bad, drugs that threaten our health, the toxic metal lead and all of the other contaminants commonly found in tap-water. We just need to buy an inexpensive device and install on the faucets of our home.
That’s what I’m trying to let people know. It’s something that reporters never seem to mention. They attract you with scary headlines about pharmaceuticals in water supply samples, then tell you there’s not much of a “threat” and then leave you with no solution. Now, you know what to do.
About the Author: Thomas Manso Is very passionate about the importance of drinking clean filtered water. Thomas Believes that filtered water should be one of the first steps taken in your approach for a better health.
Hair Loss Research, Yesterday, Today & Tomorrow
Posted by: | CommentsThe days of bad toupees and worse looking plug jobs are just about behind us. For more than 99% of human history, hair loss has pretty much been an unavoidable part of life. If you lived long enough, sooner or later, your hair, so dense and vibrant in youth, would thin, perhaps just a little, perhaps to the point of slick baldness. Until quite recently, no one could predict with certainty how extensive the loss would be. Even today, there is more art then science in gauging the rate, degree and extent of alopecia that any given person will experience.
For a certain percentage of people affected by the problem, the issue of baldness was never much of an issue. They recognized it as a normal part of aging, shrugged, sighed, and got on with the business of getting through their day. But for others, hair loss became the defining touchstone in their lives, driving many to desperation and some poor souls even to the point of suicide. Pattern hair loss also inspired a legion of creative individuals to imagine solutions, some quite ingenious, others just plain bad.
For thousands of years, concoctions were brewed, hair pieces fabricated, and incantations uttered, all in an effort to turn back the cruel tide. What always remained elusive was a genuine cure.
But as the saying goes, times they are a’changin. Particularly, within the past twenty years, medical science has begun to catch up with pent-up demand. Before we discuss things further, some perspective.
For the sake of brevity, let us touch on the three primary means to address pattern hair loss today. Cosmetic cover up, medical treatment, and surgical restoration. Cosmetic cover up consists of two main approaches. The first involves bulking up the hair or coloring the scalp so as to camouflage the problem. Alternatively, non-living hair may be applied to the scalp in some fashion, e.g. by the use of hair pieces or wigs.
Medical treatment is defined as the use of pharmaceuticals or, more recently, naturally-derived reagents. These drugs or natural compositions may be ingested orally or applied to the scalp, depending on their design.
Surgical restoration is a means to redistribute viable hair bearing skin tissue from the sides and back of the scalp to the front and top so that a cosmetically improved appearance is achieved. Kind of like using sections of lawn from your back yard to fill in empty spots in your front yard. Each of these treatment choices has their place and each has their limitations. At the present time, no single option works well for everyone.
But in coming years, the choices will undoubtedly get better. Much better, in fact. Today, in teaching universities, private labs and elsewhere, the search is on to develop a legitimate cure for pattern hair loss. With the space remaining, this article shall focus on the two most likely candidate approaches likely to bear fruit, gene therapy and hair cloning.
In the next decade, gene therapy will certainly become one of the game changers of 21st Century medicine. At the molecular heart of most debilitating and lethal disease, genetic mutations do their dirty work. Numerous forms of cancer, diseases of aging, and yes, even common pattern hair loss owe their pathogeneses to genetic mutation. Think of genes as the software running the cellular hardware in our bodies and you begin to grasp the concept of how genetic mutation occurs.
As the cells in our body age they are generally replaced, often multiple times. Copies of copies of copies are churned out, for the most part, each without defect or flaw. But as time passes, genetic errors accumulate. Some of these errors are relatively minor and we never notice their occurrence. Others are more serious. Eventually, the errors are serious enough that clinical disease ensues. Gene therapy is a methodology and a new medical discipline that, organ system by organ system, will, in effect, correct genetic errors and restore the cellular machinery to optimal performance.
In the hair follicle, key genes have already been identified, that when pathologically mutated, result in hair growth dysfunction. There are any number of hair loss diseases and most are mediated in some manner by genetic events. Common pattern hair loss happens to be a disorder where a number of genes effectively conspire to gang up on susceptible scalp hair follicles causing them to whither and die. Correcting these genetic errors, gene by gene, is high on the list of those molecular biologists focused on the problem at hand.
Hair cloning takes a different approach to the challenge in that rather than reprograming defective cellular machinery, brand new hair follicles are grown as complete organ structures from a carefully selected population of stem cells in vitro. These stem cells are extracted from whatever viable donor hair remains and amplified under culture conditions so that they become numerous. The cells are then subjected to growth factors and other stimuli whereby entire hair follicles are created in a three dimensional in vitro setting.
Ultimately, when viable, these newly grown hair follicles will be inserted into the denuded areas of the scalp where, presumably, they will happily and vigorously recapitulate a pattern of healthy hair growth. This amazing feat will require a synthesis of molecular biology, proteomics, 3D tissue scaffolding, and other marvels of 21st Century science. To achieve the goal we will need to develop an exquisitely detailed understanding of tissue organogenesis such that the newly synthesized hair follicle’s structural axis and polarity may be properly aligned. Let’s go through that concept again, but this time using an easy, albeit imperfect, analogy.
Imagine, for a moment that you are a future farmer trying to create a new onion from onion stem cells. At some point in the process you’ll probably want to make sure that the roots are pointing down and the stalk is pointing up, so that your onions don’t end up growing upside down or sideways. Same principles apply here. All the parts and pieces need to fit together correctly so that the machine works as it should. Using this crude analogy we can begin to appreciate some of the challenges of working in three dimensions that do not occur when, for example, growing a simple monolayer of cells in a petri dish.
Monumental challenges notwithstanding, the odds are reasonably good that in the coming decade, one or both of these approaches will constitute the new state-of-the-art in hair restoration methodology.
Ph.D., Human Physiology, 2000. Chief Scientific Officer, Advanced Restoration Technologies, DBA, HairGenesis
A Look at Compulsory Licensing & Essential Medicines in the Pharmaceutical Industry
Posted by: | CommentsCompulsory licensing of essential medicines doesn’t always provide the greatest help to the poorest people of the world according to a round table highlighted by The Policy Network. The danger of compulsory licensing is that it can be abused by some in developing countries and create a culture of disrespect for intellectual property. The solution, rather than overt compulsory licensing, is to encourage these governments to respect intellectual property, thus creating incentives for the development of new medicines or technology. As mentioned by Dr.Bibek Debroy, Research Director at India’s Rajiv Gandhi Institute, when a property owner is allowed to protect his rights to the land, it provides him an incentive to develop and improve the land. Pharmaceutical intellectual property protection gives the developer the ability to finance the further advancement of that medicine. A compulsory license that is granted without sufficient cause dilutes the incentive for the developer of the medicine to improve the product.
How Compulsory Licensing Works
The concept of compulsory licensing for pharmaceuticals was originally developed to give the poorest countries in the world access to essential medicines in a time of crisis. For example, let’s say an African country is being overrun by an AIDS epidemic, but they can’t afford the brand name medications to be shipped overseas in the quantity they need. A compulsory license allows them to use the patent of the medication to manufacture it on their own so long as a royalty is paid to the intellectual property owner. However, the concept could be abused by pirates in developing countries to create generics of the drug with intent on capitalizing on a business opportunity.
The Intellectual Property Solution
Fortunately, a 2003 amendment to TRIP by the WTO to give the poorest countries alternatives to receiving the medicine they need has helped restore the concept of the compulsory license to its original intent. The amendment gives more oversight to making sure the medicines reach their intended destinations and are properly distributed as well as ensures that compulsory licenses are granted only to countries that do not have the means to develop their own medicines.
Pharmaceutical News 2.0 is run by James Wachai, a professional blogger. Each article highlighted on Pharmaceutical News 2.0 features one of several issues facing the pharmaceutical industry today. Topics include essential medicines, compulsory licensing, drug patents, essential medicines, biopiracy, and more.
Reductil (sibutramine) – the Helpful Diet Pill
Posted by: | Commentsbr>Reductil is one of the most prescribed weight loss pills in modern times. Considered both safe and effective, Reductil is helping thousands of overweight people shed extra pounds and get in shape. By virtue of its active ingredient Sibutramine, which works as an appetite suppressant, Reductil curbs the appetite of people so that they do not tend to overeat. Thus by putting a control on calorie input Reductil helps people lose as much as 10-15% of their body weight.
But, Reductil is no âmagic pillâ. The drug should be taken only when other methods of weight loss such as dieting and exercise have not proved effective. And, even while taking Reductil people are advised to eat low-calorie diet and follow exercise regimen to achieve their weight loss goal.
Reductil (sibutramine) is marketed by Abott Pharmaceuticals in Europe and most other countries. In the US, Sibutramine is sold by the name of Meridia. It may also be noted that Reductil (sibutramine) is a prescription only weight loss pill and should only be taken after consultation with a doctor.
About Reductil
Reductil (sibutramine) helps you lose weight by making you feel âfullâ even when you have eaten less.
When we eat enough, the cells in our brain release two naturally occurring chemicals called noradrenaline and serotonin. These chemicals are responsible for moderating mood and various other processes in the brain. As soon as the levels of these chemicals go up to a certain level we get a feeling of being âfullâ and we stop eating. Following this, noradrenaline and serotonin are re-absorbed in the nerve cells and eventually the levels of these chemicals go down to levels that cause the feeling of hunger and we eat again.
Reductil targets this very mechanism of our brain that makes us feel âfullâ and cause us to feel âhungryâ. Sibutramine, the active ingredient in Reductil works by preventing the re-absorption of noradrenaline and serotonin. Hence, the levels of these chemicals remain at higher levels for people who take Reductil. This means, people on Reductil will feel full after eating lesser food and the appetite between meals will be suppressed.
People on Reductil therefore successfully lose weight as they take reduced size of meals and will have a reduced tendency to indulge in snacks in between meals.
Reductil Diet Pills
Reductil has been studied for efficacy in various clinical studies. It was seen that when used in conjunction with a reduced calorie diet and appropriate physical exercise, Reductil diet pills helped 77% of patients achieve weight loss that benefited their health.
Reductil diet pills are approved for use for 12 months. The drug promotes gradual weight loss over this period. Clinical studies have shown that people who use Reductil sibutramine along with a sensible lifestyle lose two or three times more weight as compared to those who try to shed weight by dieting and exercise alone.
Reductil (sibutramine) is a prescription only drug and should be taken only after consultation with a doctor. Reductil diet pills are recommended for use by people with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 30 or above. Reductil may also be used by people with a BMI of 27 or above if they have other obesity related risk factors such as Type II diabetes or high cholesterol.
Reductil diet pills come in the form of capsules in the dosage strength of 10mg and 15mg. The standard recommended dosage of Reductil is one 10mg or 15mg pill once a day taken at least an hour before eating. For best results, you may take Reductil diet pill in the morning just before your first meal.
Side Effects of Reductil
Like all prescription medicines Reductil (sibutramine) also comes with certain side effects. Commonly reported side effects of Reductil diet pills include constipation, anxiety, mild headache, dizziness, insomnia, dry mouth, and reduction in the ability to drive or operate machinery safely. These side effects are mild in nature and usually occur only in the first few weeks of the treatment.
Severe side effects of Reductil include allergic reactions (difficulty breathing, closing of the throat, swelling of the lips, tongue, face or hives), irregular heartbeat, high blood pressure, severe headache, blurred vision, or seizures. If you notice any of these side effects stop taking Reductil immediately and consult your doctor immediately.